Appealing the decisions of the investigating judge refusing to lift the seizure of property
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2025 9:11 am
That's why the number of online platforms where you can find a mental health support specialist has increased. And there are also chatbots that, without involving a specialist, can help you understand whether you need professional help. If this is not necessary, they will suggest breathing or other calming exercises.
All these trends — online doctor consultations, prevention instead of treatment, access to chatbots and applications that will help improve stress resistance and track health indicators — in my opinion, will continue in the future. And AI will be even more deeply integrated into Ukrainian medicine. The question that probably worries many: will AI in Ukraine be able to do without a doctor? Hardly. After all, in our society, medicine is perceived as the interaction of a person with a person. But "man - machine" is already a break in special database the template, therefore it causes distrust.
Legal possibility of appealing the decisions of the investigating judge refusing to lift the seizure of property
Article 41 of the Constitution of Ukraine stipulates that everyone has the right to own, use and dispose of their property, the results of their intellectual and creative activities. The right to private property is inviolable.
According to Article 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, any interference by public authorities with the right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions must be lawful and must pursue a legitimate aim “in the public interest”. Any interference must also be proportionate to the aim pursued. In other words, a “fair balance” must be struck between the general interests of society and the obligation to protect the fundamental rights of a particular individual. The necessary balance will not be achieved if a personal and excessive burden is placed on the person or persons concerned (ECtHR judgment in the case of “Sukhanov and Ilchenko v. Ukraine”).
All these trends — online doctor consultations, prevention instead of treatment, access to chatbots and applications that will help improve stress resistance and track health indicators — in my opinion, will continue in the future. And AI will be even more deeply integrated into Ukrainian medicine. The question that probably worries many: will AI in Ukraine be able to do without a doctor? Hardly. After all, in our society, medicine is perceived as the interaction of a person with a person. But "man - machine" is already a break in special database the template, therefore it causes distrust.
Legal possibility of appealing the decisions of the investigating judge refusing to lift the seizure of property
Article 41 of the Constitution of Ukraine stipulates that everyone has the right to own, use and dispose of their property, the results of their intellectual and creative activities. The right to private property is inviolable.
According to Article 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, any interference by public authorities with the right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions must be lawful and must pursue a legitimate aim “in the public interest”. Any interference must also be proportionate to the aim pursued. In other words, a “fair balance” must be struck between the general interests of society and the obligation to protect the fundamental rights of a particular individual. The necessary balance will not be achieved if a personal and excessive burden is placed on the person or persons concerned (ECtHR judgment in the case of “Sukhanov and Ilchenko v. Ukraine”).