Without going into theory

[rifat28dddd]

I consider this phenomenon (crime) to be a complete force majeure, since it violates the rules of the market game, i.e. deprives other market participants of the opportunity to enter this platform. Also, such a phenomenon leads to monopolization (as correctly noted, it corrupts...). The scourge of our market (consumer goods) is the bonuses of retail chains. How to fight this? First, by government measures (which is not very effective, as practice has shown (corruption, etc.)). Second, by creating unions of industrialists (alcoholic producers have shown this quite effectively)...

Kickbacks, if you subtract from them both the criminal and moral (more precisely, immoral) components, still remain an extremely ineffective instrument.

Why?Another element that matters here is projects that are iceland cell phone number list ordered purely for the purpose of spending the budget. In such cases, the quality of the project is of extremely little importance; a useless report is simply shelved. In such cases, kickback schemes are most applicable - if the client doesn't care about the result, it is quite likely that he will care about the material reward (the kickback, actually).

My opinion is that we should first of all fight against such senseless projects. If we get rid of them, we will also get rid of kickbacks.

(if you want, you can google “three-key model”) I’ll say this:

By giving a kickback to a client's employee, you guarantee yourself that this client will never be loyal to your company, and also that sooner or later you will lose him (when your competitor can offer better kickback conditions).

If we take the moral side, kickback (complicity in theft) is a sin, in my opinion, according to any religion.

If we take the criminal side, I can say that once an acquaintance of mine was caught in an OBEP operation when he gave money to a terrible crooked buyer. They barely got him out. Later he told me that those were the most terrible three days of his life.